77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of your regulation laid down because of the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority on the parent department in the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and because only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The case addresses A variety of issues which includes, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation in the right to life.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment in the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become constructed.
Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners might seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
She did note that the boy still needed intensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was obtaining counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.
If the click here employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only completed When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
During the United States, folks are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember 1 rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only towards the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.